ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03156
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His bad conduct discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge
based on 4 years and 8 months of service.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
A similar appeal was considered and denied by the Board on
5 June 2012. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances
surrounding the applicants bad conduct discharge and the
rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record
of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit G.
On 15 June 2012 the applicant submitted a request for
reconsideration. In support of his request, he submits a DD
Form 293, Application for Review of Discharge from the Armed
Force of the United States and four witness statements.
The applicants complete submission with attachments is at
Exhibit H.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
In earlier findings, the Board determined there was insufficient
evidence to warrant any corrective action. After thoroughly
reviewing the additional documentation submitted in support of
his appeal and the evidence of record, we do not believe the
applicant has overcome the rationale expressed in our previous
decision. Therefore, in view of the above, and in the absence
of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon which to
recommend favorable reconsideration of the applicants request.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
BC-2011-03156 in Executive Session on 1 November 2012, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit G. ROP, dtd 5 June 2012, w/Exhibits A through F.
Exhibit H. DD Form 293, dtd 24 May 2012, w/atchs.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01973-2
________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Panel Chair AFBCMR 1500 West Perimeter Road, Suite 3700 Joint Base...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 01973 2
________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Panel Chair AFBCMR 1500 West Perimeter Road, Suite 3700 Joint Base...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04234-2
For an accounting of the facts and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit F. On 5 November 2012 the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-1990-02453-4
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants request; and, the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit E. On 8 May 2006, 12 August 2011 and 13 September 2011, the applicant was notified that his requests for reconsideration were not favorably considered as he failed to submit new and relevant evidence. In support of his request, he submits a personal statement with several signatures and several...
AF | BCMR | CY1990 | BC 1990 02453 4
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants request; and, the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit E. On 8 May 2006, 12 August 2011 and 13 September 2011, the applicant was notified that his requests for reconsideration were not favorably considered as he failed to submit new and relevant evidence. In support of his request, he submits a personal statement with several signatures and several...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00887 ADDENDUM
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00887 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Medal for Humane Action (MHA) for his participation in the Berlin Airlift. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants separation; and, the rationale of the earlier decision by the...
AF | BCMR | CY1990 | BC 1990 02737 2
On 20 August 2009, a copy of the FBI report was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit L). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: In earlier findings, the Board determined that there was insufficient evidence to warrant correcting the records to upgrade the applicants discharge. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this...
AF | BCMR | CY1991 | BC 1991 01020 5
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-1991-01020 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable. On 14 February 1953, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Air Force Regulation (AFR) 39-18, Special Court-Martial Order 91, with a BCD. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02611-2
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit F. On 30 November 2012, the applicants counsel submitted a request for reconsideration based on their submission of affidavits from the applicants former husband (member) and his current spouse agreeing to the requested relief and voluntarily relinquishing all rights and/or benefits under the members pre- and post-retirement...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 01852 2
________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After again reviewing this application and the new evidence provided by the applicant in support of his appeal, we believe that his request for lost time to be removed from his records should be granted. Exhibit G. Letter, Applicant, dated 20 Feb 13, w/atchs. Exhibit H. Letter, AFLOA/JAJM, dtd 6 Mar 14.